If you enjoy nonsensical rants, brewery reviews, and/or random facts about everyday things, this is the page for you.
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
Pooyaht
Wednesday, October 04, 2017
Half-Stewish
by Rob Cottignies
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Take Me Out
by Rob Cottignies
Despite COVID-19’s best efforts, baseball is happening once again.
Normally, it would be another half-year of the same boring game in various uniform colors on every screen in bars. But now, many of us are not allowed into bars and there is not even the slightest hope of seeing a fight in the stands since cardboard is yet to attack itself.
I have often wished baseball a slow, wretched death because it is such a slow, wretched game.
…
But first, a non-baseball issue:
Before a game, everyone is asked to stand and remove their hats while the Star-Spangled Banner is performed. Standing supposedly displays respect and patriotism but therein lies a contradiction: How can something be patriotic if not everybody can do it? Are people without legs or who are wheelchair-bound not patriotic? I would think whoever made up the tradition (yes, it was simply made up one day) would have chosen something everyone can do.
And stop with this standing/kneeling debate. It doesn't matter whether someone stands, kneels, sits, lies down, vomits, or does jumping-jacks during a song. If love for your country is in your heart, that's good enough. If you want to stand during the Anthem, great. If not, great. Putting emphasis on something that really doesn't matter is useless.
Or, you know, do some research into why they’re kneeling instead of yelling about it.
The hat-removal topic is even more inane but watch George Carlin do a much better job discussing it than I ever could.
…
Back to baseball. What’s happening on the field?
Batter
steps up to the plate...
Stretches for a bit...
Demands
everyone wait for him…
Adjusts
his batting glove…
Digs
into the dirt...
Takes
some practice swings because he’s clearly new to the activity…
He's ready to bat...
The pitcher stamps his feet on the ground...
Bends over...
Looks at the catcher's crotch...
Shrugs off one signal...
Shrugs off another...
Glances at the guy on first base because he moved an inch…
Stares
at the guy on third…
Looks back at the catcher's crotch...
Shrugs off another signal...
Nods his head...
Stands up...
Looks at the guy on third, again...
Finally…THE PITCH!!!!!!
Ball one.
And it repeats...
…
Here’s how I would fix this mind-numbing routine:
Every batter gets one pitch. If the pitcher is good, he'll throw a strike. If the batter is better, he'll get a hit. One strike is an out; one ball a double; swing and miss and you're out for the game.
Also, each team gets one pitcher per game; no relief or closers. If his arm gets injured or tired, he can throw with the other one, which just might lead to hits and things happening and excitement!!!
This would also hopefully prevent a horrible pitchers’ duel. I cannot think of anything less interesting, except…
Our batter is still at the plate and the count is now 2 balls, 1 strike. We missed two instances of crotch-looking and it couldn’t matter less.
While the batter removes then replaces his batting glove for no reason, I’ll take time to note how lovely the weather is.
Baseball is always played in lovely weather because rain might cause their obnoxious uniforms to get a tad muddy or, worse yet, someone might develop a wittle itty bitty case of the sniffles. But don’t worry- If a player gets a cold he can go on the disabled list along with macho men who stubbed pinkies and didn’t get their diapers changed before nap time.
…
A little more crotch-looking and we’re at 3 balls, 2 strikes.
Is something about to happen!? The count is full so there must be action on the next pitch.
And it’s a hit!
Foul ball.
But
a foul is a strike so the batter is out, yes?
Nope.
This nightmare can only end one of three ways: 1) There will be a real strike and the batter will get angry and sit down after wasting ten minutes of everyone’s time; 2) He will hit the ball and a few people will have to move; or 3) The pitch will be outside of the strike zone and this bonehead will get to WALK to first base after accomplishing nothing.
Whatever happens will be dull but at least it won’t be an *intentional walk*. Please don’t make me describe that awful scenario.
…
What bothers me about the steroids debate is if I were to watch baseball, I’d want to see home runs. I do not care if Fastball Frankie can throw a ball with such a spin that it dips at the right time, resulting in a swing and/or miss. That guy should go into Physics and invent something useful with his skill. I want to see a smash hits which go out of the stadium to shatter people's windshields. I WANT A FINAL SCORE OF BREWERS 53, CARDINALS 45!
(Those teams were chosen randomly. I hold no allegiance, if you’ve not figured that out already.)
Also, I dislike how only one team can score per half-inning.
In real sports, one team has possession of the ball or puck but the other team can steal it and get points at any time. That’s exciting! How can you watch a team only play defense?
I propose the team in the field earns a point for pegging a base runner with the ball. Two points for a face shot. That would surely make Captain Five-O’clock-Shadow rethink stealing second.
Or, once per inning, the catcher can body-slam a batter to the ground and take his bat, hitting his own team’s pitch and scoring based on distance. But the batter can fight back with his cleats! The catcher has all that equipment on so why not use it!?
How about having only one umpire? And it’s a one-eyed four-year-old from Uzbekistan who doesn’t leave right field!
Are my suggestions practical? I don’t care. I just think baseball should be as exciting as television’s eternal coverage pretends it is.
…
I (obviously) find baseball dreadful.
For a weird segue, I find the Ku Klux Klan even more dreadful.
Check this out:
At baseball games, a common practice is to hang a banner with a K on it for every strikeout the home team gets.
In the 1800s, some limey Brit developed a system for scoring baseball games. He is responsible for the scores by inning as well as the Runs Hits Errors part after it.
My guess is he devised this structure over the course of a few games (and tea with crumpets) because he was so insanely bored.
He abbreviated a single with an S, so a player being struck out was not-so-cleverly abbreviated K.
Today, something like this happens: After strikeout #1, whoever's in charge of the banners displays a big K. After #2, another K is added next to it.
The third strikeout where things get dicey.
If the same pattern repeats, it would read KKK, which is the usual initialism for the Ku Klux Klan- a group of unsavory white folks with a particular distaste for anyone who is not white and whatever other stupid criteria.
People generally don’t want to promote that group, so the third strikeout's K is frequently reversed.
Apparently a forward or backward K indicates whether the batter struck out swinging or looking, but most of us know what three sequential Ks represents.
Also, another yawn.
These are the things baseball fans pay attention to because there is so little action during the game.
Then there’s this argument:
Offended
Guy: 'Hey, that means Ku Klux Klan.'
Banner Guy: 'No, it means the pitcher threw three strikeouts.'
No-Longer-Offended Guy: 'Oh, all right.'
And that would be it! Modern baseball does not promote white supremacy that I know of. The league and stands are filled with boring people from all sorts of boring places and backgrounds. The banner guy is not wearing a white robe with a stupid pointy hood.
Unless he is. Then the whole thing is racist.
…
I saw haircut store (a what?) in Tennessee named Kim's Klassy Kuts. Again, in Tennessee, not far from Lynchburg. That was quite likely racism disguised as something cutely vomit-inducing.
To end with an interesting bit of history, in 1925, there was a baseball game in Kansas between an all-black team and the Klan. The (black) Wichita Monrovians had an open invitation to anyone who wanted to play them.
Guess who accepted. Well, you don't have to guess because I’ve already told you.
Apparently, the game was a peaceful money-making success which ended with the Monrovians winning 10-8.
Check out the full story here.
It would be fascinating to know which direction the Ks faced during that game.
To close, baseball stinks. Have a nice day.
Friday, July 21, 2017
In The End, Blow Up The Outside World
by Rob Cottignies
I hate hypothetical
situations, but here is one anyway:
Suppose I find out that I
am going to die tomorrow. The source is 100% positive and is able to convince
me of that.
It is 5:00pm. I make some
phone calls, tie up loose ends, etc., then decide that I will not let Death
take me but I will go to him.
At 10:00pm, after eating
an entire pizza, I drink some beers that have been in my fridge for years,
waiting for their perfect time. I would not exactly call this perfect, but they
get me drunk. Really drunk. And full. Really full.
It is 11:30pm and I run
out my front door screaming.
I am wearing a Viking
helmet and no pants, chugging one last beer and looking at the visible stars
when my neighbors come over, like a drunk pants-less Viking screaming
obscenities near midnight warrants attention.
I mumble that it has been
nice living near them, then pass out. Somewhere in my mind, I know I will never
wake up.
An ambulance comes and
takes me to a hospital.
The doctors do all they can
but at 2:00am I am declared dead from alcohol poisoning.
I did it. I beat Death to
the punch.
However…
The prophecy was correct.
I died tomorrow. But what killed me started today and would not have begun unless
I heard the prophecy.
Was it really correct? If
I did not drink myself to death, would another doom have been waiting for me?
For those who believe in
fate, I was supposed to hear this prediction then get really drunk from awesome
beer. For those who do not believe, something else was definitely going to take
me out at some point tomorrow.
What is the point of all
this? I don't know. But I say you should have fun while you can because having
fun is great and not having fun is stupid.
…
Before anyone gets all
nervous or whatever, there is nothing to worry about. I am fine and shall
continue to be so until something decides I should not be anymore.
Some of you might say, 'I
know those excellent beers are strong, but would they be enough to kill you?'
Maybe not, but the shots of bourbon during the whole escapade would likely seal
the deal. And why did I not throw up? Because I am tough, that's why.
(This piece is oddly dedicated to Linkin Park singer Chester Bennington and Soundgarden singer Chris Cornell, hence the article’s
title.)
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
But Is It Irony?
by Rob Cottignies
When John Hinckley attempted to assassinate President
Ronald Reagan, he missed his intended target. Reagan, however, was standing
outside of his vehicle, which had bulletproof windows. One bullet bounced off a
window and struck the President. That window was installed specifically to
prevent Reagan from getting shot but in this instance caused a bullet to
hit him.
That is irony.
When a group protests a controversial movie, they want
to sway people from being interested in it. Quite often, the public pays more
attention to the movie because of the uproar and many people see it when they
might not have been aware of it had the group not protested.
That is irony.
When my mother called me a son of a bitch, her intent
was to insult me, yet she actually insulted herself.
That is irony.
Not one thing Alanis Morissette describes in her song
'Ironic' is ironic.
That might be irony.
Seeing some bozo wearing the same shirt as you is not
ironic. It is nothing more than a very small coincidence.
And please stop wearing that shirt. You look stupid.
…
The meaning of ‘irony’ is highly-debated but it is officially
described as something spoken or occurring that is the opposite of the intended
result.
Many people mistake
coincidence for irony, such as you and a friend both wanting pizza for lunch. The
only way this could be remotely ironic is if you went to a pizza place only to
find out they had no more food.
But that is really more
like bad luck, Alanis.
There is a myth that silent
film actor Charlie Chaplin once secretly entered a Charlie Chaplin look-alike
competition and lost. Of course, the real Charlie Chaplin would have been
expected to win such a contest. No record of this happening exists but if it
did, irony!
Sarcasm is a form of
irony, if used properly. The difference here, though, is inflection. If it is
obvious that you would hate to go to your friend’s kid’s Little League game, you
might say ‘I would LOVE to go to the game’ with a snarky tone. That
would be ironic, and your friend would probably hate you. However, if you said
with a straight face ‘I would love to go to the game’, you would simply be a
liar and your friend would be better off without you.
(And why would you want
to be friends with someone who suggests going to a Little League game as if it
would be a fun time?)
…
I recently faced a
conundrum- I wanted to run in the park and it was raining out. I generally cannot
stand wearing a wet shirt so I wore a zipped-up raincoat to prevent it from
getting soaked. After the run, I took off the coat and my shirt underneath was
soaked. Said raincoat was non-porous, therefore my body heat was raised and the
extra sweat produced caused my shirt to become soaked in gross human moisture.
I wondered if this was
ironic. The coat did its job in keeping out rain but my shirt got wet anyway because of the coat. However, if I had
not worn the coat, my shirt would still have gotten wet.
This can only be reasoned
with by inserting or removing the phrase with
rain.
'I wore this coat so my
shirt would not get wet. The coat caused my shirt to get wet.' Irony.
'I wore this coat so my
shirt would not get wet with rain.
The coat caused my shirt to get wet, but not with rain.' Not irony.
But then there is the
inevitability that the shirt would have gotten wet regardless. A person could
go crazy thinking about this stuff, which I do constantly.
The next time I feel a
rain run, I will just go nude. That will certainly show the ironic overlords
who the boss is.
Also, check out this
video spoofing Alanis's dopey song.
Monday, April 03, 2017
Sharing ≠ Caring
by Rob Cottignies
It baffles me how people
are so quick to give personal yet ultimately useless information to strangers. (If
you’re a stranger visiting this site, please forgive my hypocrisy.)
Here are three examples:
ROSIE
My friend Dennis was
working behind a bar one Sunday. Aside from me, there were three people in the
place. Dennis knew two of them so he introduced himself to the third.
Like a child under ten
years of age, she shrieked, 'My name is Rosie and it's my birthday!!!!'
Unnecessary information
shared strictly for attention. Dennis did the obligatory “nice” thing and gave
her a free beer, an act I condemn but probably would have done the same.
Shortly after, I started
texting him hateful things about Rosie. 'I hope this is Rosie's last birthday.'
'Pour her a pint of poison.' 'I wish Rosie would somehow get stuck inside her
balloon.' You know, cheerful stuff.
What I didn't know was
that Dennis's phone was not in his pocket but on the bar in front of the crew.
Nosy, as people tend to be, one of Rosie’s friends looked when it vibrated and
lit up. Fully shocked, he motioned to ask if I had sent the messages. Playing
dumb, I said, 'No, that's not my phone.' He then rudely picked it up and showed it to the other friend and Rosie.
Somebody else's phone. The
nerve.
All three looked at me in
disgust, or so Dennis told me since I didn't acknowledge them.
Apparently, they were so furious that they did the only thing furious people would do- quietly finished
their beers and left. No screaming, no defending, no fighting. Nothing.
I felt badly at the time because
I had accidentally lost Dennis some business and I feel worse now because this
story doesn't have an interesting ending.
PAIGE’S DAD
I was sitting at a bar
(noticing a theme here) when a hipster guy and an older guy came in. The bar
was otherwise empty so of course they sat near me and spoke loudly. Due to
their inconsiderate volume level, I
found out the older guy wasn't the hipster's father but the father of the hipster's
girlfriend, whose name was Paige.
I immediately hated Paige.
To make things worse, the
hipster was asking Paige's dad for "permission" to propose marriage
to her. I lost my appetite and feared what I had eaten would erupt at any
moment. Also, I knew they would somehow rope me into this garbage pile of a
conversation.
Of course, I was correct.
In a "clever"
plot to tell the "good news" to the bartender, Paige's father
introduced the hipster to him as his son-in-law. In a pure Aw shucks golly gum gee whiz moment, the hipster said it was too
early to be saying that. Not to be outdone, Paige's dad said that no one would
blab because only the three of them knew. "And this guy."
Me. Poor, unfortunate me.
At least they sort of
acknowledged how loudly they were speaking.
I looked up to see their
idiotic faces staring at me, so I said I wouldn't tell anyone because I didn't
care.
Do you think that was
mean? Do you also think honesty is the best policy? Hypocrite.
DALE & BELINDA
I met my friend Julia at
a concert and she was with a friend whose name was not Dale but I instantly
forgot it so here we are.
Julia introduced us then suggested
getting beer, which is always a great idea. She offered to buy the first
round, leaving Dale and me to stand there awkwardly. I hate small talk but
sometimes it can't be avoided.
Aside from standing in
the same building, the only thing we had in common was knowing Julia so I asked
how they met.
Immediately, he replied,
'She was friends with my wife who died last month.'
I had JUST met this guy and he told me the
worst news of his life.
What was I to do? My mind
didn't automatically go to expressing condolences or asking how he was doing,
so I asked how it happened since I was mildly curious and he opened the door.
He shouted, 'THAT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.' I was ready to say, 'You made it my
business' but Julia came back with the beers and obviously that was more
important.
I never found out what
happened to Dale's wife, so here's my theory based on exactly zero information:
Dale and his wife,
Belinda, were walking along a city street. They'd both tried to quit smoking
many times without success. Dale took his last drag and flicked the cigarette
butt into the street.
Ever the
environmentalist, Belinda reached down to pick it up and place it in a proper
waste receptacle.
At that exact moment, a
truck swerved from its lane to avoid hitting an old woman named Sue who was
standing in the middle of the street for no reason. This truck hit Belinda and
knocked her head clean off her body. It flew into the nearest waste receptacle
with the cigarette in her mouth, exactly how she would've wanted it.
However, the butt ignited
the contents of the receptacle and the two children playing near it. Also, the
decapitated body gave Sue an awful fright and she died on the spot from a heart
attack, so it was all for nothing.
See what you made me do,
Dale? You were inconsiderate and years later a guy you've probably forgotten
made up a horrible (though likely accurate) story about your wife dying. This
is the pain you have caused. You're a monster.
…
Why do people share this
stuff with strangers!?!?
Attention, that's why.
These are the same people
who "send" thoughts and prayers to victims on social media. Attention
makes them feel good, so I suggest giving them none.
But I guess this article
counts as giving them attention so figure that out for yourselves.
Whatever. Leave me alone.